procedural default
procedural default n: a failure to follow state appellate procedure (as in the exhaustion of state remedies) that bars federal esp. habeas corpus review of a case in the absence of a showing of cause for and prejudice from the failure or sometimes in the absence of proof that the bar would result in a miscarriage of justice

Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law. . 1996.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Procedural default — is a concept in American Federal Courts law that requires a state prisoner seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus in federal court to have present [ed] his federal law argument to the state courts [on direct review] in compliance with state procedural… …   Wikipedia

  • default judgment — see judgment 1a Merriam Webster’s Dictionary of Law. Merriam Webster. 1996. default judgment …   Law dictionary

  • Default judgment — Civil procedure in the United States Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Doctrines of civil procedure Jurisdiction Subject matter jurisdiction Diversity jurisdiction Personal jurisdiction Removal jurisdiction Venue Change of venue …   Wikipedia

  • procedural law — Law that prescribes the procedures and methods for enforcing rights and duties and for obtaining redress (e.g., in a suit). It is distinguished from substantive law (i.e., law that creates, defines, or regulates rights and duties). Procedural law …   Universalium

  • LaGrand case — Federal Republic of Germany v. United States, ussc|526|111|1999 (per curiam) was a case in the International Court of Justice, Case Concerning the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Germany v. United States of America) , General List No.… …   Wikipedia

  • Roger Keith Coleman — (November 1, 1958 – May 20, 1992) was a Grundy, Virginia, coal miner convicted and executed for the murder of his sister in law, Wanda McCoy. Coleman s case drew national and worldwide attention before and after his execution because of his… …   Wikipedia

  • Day v. McDonough — Supreme Court of the United States Argued February 27, 2006 Decided April 25, 2006 …   Wikipedia

  • 2004 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States — The Supreme Court of the United States handed down six per curiam opinions during its 2004 term, which lasted from October 4, 2004 until October 3, 2005. These were all decisions in which the Court either dismissed a writ of certiorari as… …   Wikipedia

  • Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon — Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants = Sanchez Llamas v. Oregon ArgueDate = March 29 ArgueYear = 2006 DecideDate = June 28 DecideYear = 2006 FullName = Moises Sanchez Llamas v. Oregon Docket = 04 10566 OralArgument =… …   Wikipedia

  • Smith v. Texas (2007) — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Smith v. Texas ArgueDate=January 17 ArgueYear=2007 DecideDate=April 25 DecideYear=2007 FullName=LaRoyce Lathair Smith v. Texas CitationNew= Docket= USVol=550 USPage= Prior= Subsequent= Holding=Texas Court of Criminal Appeals… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.